🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a growing group of nations are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our children's youth". The policy could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to enact a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a related move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a teenager who died after encountering disturbing online content argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," said a prominent peer.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Across America, legislation is largely unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain individuals to mimic this lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Views

Apart from the West, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, global bodies take a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this international debate continues, the actions of the Australian government and others show that governments internationally are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.