🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a Russian James Bond who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a television show launched last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” Russia from disorder. Although he is called Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions frequently result in buttressing this identical story rather than debunking it. A new film based on a popular book aims to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is shown as having been picked by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to this process stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the country de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the process said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of him as a master operative was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. The grittier version led Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. Its omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures in the story, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who remains unseen on screen. He is signaled through photographs or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it might seek to question.